|
page: ~1~ [2]
|
| Author |
|
New York Democrat breaks four campaign promises in 1 hour
|
Messages
1
-
17
|
|
Shades of gray
msg
local #310840
|
|
Aircooled
msg
local #9514
online
|
posted
Sat Nov 7 11:30 am
|
13130 posts · tenured: May '04
|
Delete
Edit
|
Stunning!
Republicans NEVER break promises.
Do they?
|
|
Mr.Tim
msg
local #41716
online
|
posted
Sat Nov 7 11:34 am
|
545 posts · tenured: Mar '05
|
Delete
Edit
|
I love it...people deserve this...they voted him in they get what they deserve...time to make a real change people...I once use to be a"sheeple"but have seen the light,Im tired of all the bs from the left and right
|
|
Justun
msg
local #2765
|
posted
Sat Nov 7 2:14 pm
|
1145 posts · tenured: Dec '03
|
Delete
Edit
|
I'm with Tim...
With all the debate about the 2 party system and those yammering on about a 3rd party... I just want a smart party...
|
|
vikesrock
msg
local #307371
|
posted
Sat Nov 7 2:23 pm
|
65 posts · tenured: Jul '09
|
Delete
Edit
|
Stunning! Republicans NEVER break promises. Do they?
Ahh yes, the "I know you are but what am I!?" Democratic response. Change..you can believe in!
|
|
Arden
msg
local #7657
online
|
posted
Sat Nov 7 2:58 pm
|
3862 posts · tenured: Mar '04
|
Delete
Edit
|
I keep telling you all that I'll run in 2020.
I promise to be only minimally crooked, and to use my crookedness to put the money I jack from what others would be porkin ( <- trying that word out ) into your pocket.
|
|
Slycon
msg
local #66274
|
posted
Sat Nov 7 8:19 pm
|
14337 posts · tenured: Jul '05
|
Delete
Edit
|
New York Democrat breaks four campaign promises in 1 hour
Didn't see that one coming...
Of course, on a positive note, he will have to defend his seat in just one year's time. The Dems better get their so-called "health care reform" passed soon.
|
|
Aircooled
msg
local #9514
online
|
posted
Sat Nov 7 8:25 pm
|
13130 posts · tenured: May '04
|
Delete
Edit
|
Ahh yes, the "I know you are but what am I!?" Democratic response. Change..you can believe in!
I'm a democrat?
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
vikesrock
msg
local #307371
|
posted
Sun Nov 8 12:30 am
|
65 posts · tenured: Jul '09
|
Delete
Edit
|
I'm a democrat? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I fully expected this response. Reading your posts for some time you may not be a registered Democrat, maybe a better term is liberal apologist?
|
|
ripped11110
msg
local #239036
|
posted
Sun Nov 8 12:49 am
|
2052 posts · tenured: Nov '07
|
Delete
Edit
|
maybe a better term is liberal apologist?
|
|
Bugs44rn
msg
local #64753
|
posted
Sun Nov 8 12:51 am
|
674 posts · tenured: Jul '05
|
Delete
Edit
|
LOL I wonder what nutbag vikesrock used to be?
|
|
Aircooled
msg
local #9514
online
|
posted
Sun Nov 8 7:38 am
|
13130 posts · tenured: May '04
|
Delete
Edit
|
Vikesrock, you are more "liberal" than I.
By the way, have you ever c\seen a Jihadist besides your thumbnail or on TV?
|
|
vikesrock
msg
local #307371
|
posted
Sun Nov 8 8:29 am
|
65 posts · tenured: Jul '09
|
Delete
Edit
|
No, can't say I make a habit of it. My time in the military consisted of standing between warring factions in Bosnia, living in an airplane for 3 days in Rawanda while the Russians thumbed their nose at us, and wondering why the hell I was in Somalia in the first place.
|
|
Shades of gray
msg
local #310840
|
posted
Sun Nov 8 1:28 pm
|
275 posts · tenured: Aug '09
|
Delete
Edit
|
In his campaign he said he would not vote for a public option. Meanwhile, back in Washington, Pelosi was saying she had his vote.
He literally, plainly, and unambiguously altered his views less than an hour after being sworn in. Most people try to hide their deceit. In this case, the stink is absolutely unmistakeable: he flat out lied.
|
|
myronenamis
msg
local #308178
|
posted
Sun Nov 8 1:34 pm
|
913 posts · tenured: Jul '09
|
Delete
Edit
|
And what do you expect in the Most Ethical Congress ever....
|
|
Gojera
msg
local #16761
|
posted
Mon Nov 9 4:30 pm
|
8440 posts · tenured: Aug '04
|
Delete
Edit
|
The post links here.
UPDATED: A spokesman for Congressman Owens indicated correctly that Mr. Owens had recanted his solid position against public option later in the campaign, clarifying that he did not wish public option to be a 'litmus test' for the Health Reform bill and that on Oct. 30th, several days prior to the election, in a debate had stated that he generally supported the public option as it was now written (at that time.)
|
|
Slycon
msg
local #66274
|
posted
Tue Nov 10 12:43 am
|
14337 posts · tenured: Jul '05
|
Delete
Edit
|
N.Y. Special Election Candidates Debate
Owens said he was mostly pleased with the bill, but was noncommittal on whether he would vote for or against a measure with a public option.
He went from being opposed to a bill with a public option, to noncommittal just 3 days before the election, to voting for the bill without hesitation? Yeah, that makes it all better.
What a lying sack of shit.
|
|
|
Messages
1
-
17
page: ~1~ [2]
|