Follow us on Twitter.Follow us on Facebook. Share With A Friend Get mojo on your mobile device! Change skins and the appearance of your mojo.
869 locals online
Resources
News
Other
Mojo on the Road
Friends of Mojo

<To Tweet Or Not To Tweet: That Is the Question
Derby Picks 2009>

JUL
1
2009
Breakfast at Wimbledon?
Wed @ 12:53 pm
News Channel: sports      Category: sports
views: 1030  kudos: 0     bit.ly    post to facebook    post to twitter
      + 

I have two comments to make about the spectacle that is Wimbledon.

First, the retractable roof over Centre Court.

I'm boycotting Wimbledon this year because of the roof.

We see how money can influence and take away a special element from one of the oldest, most prestigious sporting events in the world.

They played Wimbledon for over a century without a roof. Now there's a roof. So now they can keep things moving. Get all the important matches in.

But at what cost?

The bleacher bums won't be able to get in on that once-a-generation Monday Wimbledon Final. And something else is lost. Rain delays were just a part of the event for over a hundred years. Now they're minimized to mixed doubles matches in the far courts. Wimbledon isn't the same as it was without the roof. Tradition once again takes a backseat to filling wallets and worshiping at the teat of Television.

Speaking of television, they must be thrilled. Both Venus and Serena Williams have advanced to the Quarter Finals of the Women's Draw. On the men's side, Andy Roddick has survived to the "Elite 8". It's really the best that Television could have hoped for.

And why is that?

Since the beginning of televised tennis in the United States, the theme has been jingoism and nationalism. It's not an event where you celebrate great players. Television has always fed the nationalistic angle. They highlight American players, and foster an "Us vs. Them" mentality.

That worked great in the 1970's. It still worked well even to the beginning of this decade. But the past five years have seen tennis flourish around the world, and it has become more of a world sport without the U.S. domination. So Television is presented with the problem of how to promote this sport, when the finals of Men's Wimbledon may not sport an American player for another generation.

And the truth is, they can't. What they have promoted for decades is so deeply ingrained, that American fans have no interest in a "Russia vs. Sweeden" Final. Television chose its destiny and now it must live with the consequences of poor ratings when Americans do poorly most years.

ADD A COMMENT

print   ·   give kudos   ·   send to a friend   ·   report abuse   ·   add to watch   ·   subscribe    ·

<To Tweet Or Not To Tweet: That Is the Question
Derby Picks 2009>
 
More Stories in sports
  Why Not An All-Cindrella Final Four?
What Kind of Job Did Pitino Do?     21
Cats Roll Against ETSU, Look to Exorcise Demons
FEATURE:  MARCH (and April) MADNESS     1
Norton Healthcare Get Healthy     1
Norton Audubon Hospital presents: Throo the Zoo 5K Run/Walk
Steve's New Derby Top 15 3.18.10
Crystal Ballin: The Tournament Edition for the Bluegrass Fan
FEATURE:  B.O. Knows Hoops     14
Butler Can Join UK, Kansas, Duke in Indy     2
FEATURE:  Wall-to-Wall Balls on WLKY-TV     8
Tiger's Coming Back, But What's It Mean for The Masters?     8
No NCAA Joy for My Students     1
SEC Tournament: Road to the Northern Border
Did Louisville Invent the 'High Five'?     3


AddThis Feed Button    
Rand
send msg

Sports commentary unfit to print in the local rag newspaper.

Email: Click to send Email

Top of blog
More from Rand

Search this blog: 
 
Favorite Links:
My Blog
ChucklenutShirts.com
My photo galleries
Advice Column
w2